On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 5:11 AM Silvia Sánchez <bhkoh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello all, > > This didn't happen to me with the last version (F28) but I didn't > install Workstation, I installed KDE Spin. So now my question is: Does > this affect to all Fedoras, including Spins and Labs, or is it an issue > that for some reason affects Workstation only? > > Kind regards. > Silvia > FAS: Lailah > > It affects anyone who has installed the fedora-workstation-repos package, which is installed by default only on Fedora Workstation (as it really doesn’t do anything useful except in the context of GNOME Software). > On Thu, 25 Oct 2018 at 21:01, Stephen Gallagher <sgall...@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 3:06 PM Till Hofmann <thofm...@fedoraproject.org> >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > On 10/25/18 4:02 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> > > It was discovered[1] a short while ago that, due to a packaging >> > > mistake in the fedora-workstation-repos package, upgrades from Fedora >> > > 28->Fedora 29 would replace the /etc/yum.repos.d/*.repo files provided >> > > from that package with their default configuration. >> > > >> > > What this meant in practice is that anyone who was using those >> > > repositories in Fedora 28 would find them silently disabled in Fedora >> > > 29. In particular, this would mean that they might not notice that >> > > they were not receiving updates, particularly (in the case of Chrome) >> > > security updates. >> > > >> > > This has been fixed for F29 Final, but if you have upgraded from >> > > F28->F29 prior to today (such as at the Beta release), you should >> > > check and verify that your expected repos are correctly enabled. >> > > >> > >> > Is it possible that this also happened on F28? I haven't upgraded to F29 >> > yet, but surprisingly my google-chrome repo is disabled and I'm using >> > Chrome 68.0.3440.84 from 2 months ago. I'm pretty sure I never disabled >> > the repo manually. >> > >> >> If there was a post-release update to the fedora-workstation-repos >> package in F28, it's entirely possible, yes. It would have had the >> same issue. >> _______________________________________________ >> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> List Archives: >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
