Thank you very much for your replies.
No 'rhgb' is the workaround in my case. I added my comment to the bug
report you mentioned Fabio.

Any idea who is handling this, current status and how/when/why this will be
solved ?

BR, Alain


On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 1:05 AM Fabio Valentini <decatho...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 11:41 PM Alain Vigne <alain.vigne...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone
> > TLDR; I had a working Wayland Gnome Desktop in f28. Not anymore with f29.
> >
> > Yesterday, I "dnf upgrade" my f28 to f29 ... to find a black screen when
> I want to login to my Gnome session :(
> >
> > The boot is OK till the gdm login screen, but when I enter my password,
> the screen turns black, and the keyboard is locked (non-responsive, Num
> Lock does not toggle, nor caps lock).
> > Then I don't know how to recover control, as no key binding is
> effective, no mouse, no screen :(I power off the machine)
> >
> > I successfully launched the desktop using "startx" from my user account
> after booting with runlevel=3, so I think there is an issue with Wayland !
> >
> > > lspci|grep "VGA"
> > 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GM206 [GeForce GTX
> 960] (rev a1)
> > I used to install the nvidia drivers, after each kernel upgrade. I did
> that, as usual using:
> > > ./NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-410.73.run
> >
> > Where should I look to have more information about what's wrong with my
> system ?
> > Which component should I report on BZ ?
> > What additional info would be helpful for knowledgeable developers ?
> >
> > Thanks for your help
> > Best regards
> > --
> > Alain V.
>
> Hi Alain,
>
> This seems to be a common issue with fedora 29 / NVIDIA drivers, I
> reported it here:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643302
>
> And there are some people on reddit who seem to be affected, too.
>
> Have you tried dropping "rhgb" from the kernel command line (by
> editing the GRUB boot entry)? (Possibly also change
> nvidia-drm.modeset=1 to nvidia-drm.modeset=0 to disable wayland in
> gdm.)
> Most people seem to confirm that this serves as a workaround.
>
> Fabio
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>


-- 
Alain V.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to