On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 01:13:05PM +0000, Dave Love wrote: > Miro Hrončok <mhron...@redhat.com> writes: > > > On 18. 12. 18 11:22, Dave Love wrote: > >>> loveshack: makedepf90 > >> > >> I don't think that's the case now. dl_poly used it, but I've removed > >> the dependency and I wonder why it's showing up with a threat (I assume) > >> to remove dl_poly. > > > > Indeed: > > > > Depending on: makedepf90 (1), status change: 2017-10-06 (62 weeks ago) > > dl_poly (maintained by: loveshack) > > dl_poly-1.10-1.fc30.src requires makedepf90 = 2.8.8-15.fc29 > > > > > > That is because > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dl_poly/c/b39e9ea3ac097d85e6574c1167088c8c3d68031b?branch=master > > was never built and the metadata are taken from the repos. > > Does that mean we actually have to rebuild things to prevent them > getting removed?
This is being discussed in the fesco ticket starting at https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1970#comment-546480. It seems that the policy will become to open a FTBFS bug (or possibly wait for the mass rebuild, since we have one coming up), and let the usual FTBFS policy take over. So if the package builds, there should be no issue. If it FTBFS, the package will be retired after some time. Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
