On Sun, Jan 06, 2019 at 12:35:25PM -0500, Paul Frields wrote: > Update: We'll be having discussions over the next few weeks to figure > out how we can accommodate Lifecycle work without interrupting the > Fedora release cadence. That includes in Brno, where we can meet up > f2f with people working on parallel projects in automation, CI, and so > on. We may also be able to grab additional people to do work here -- > so this doesn't automatically equate to "we have to do more with > less/the same people." After talking with the Council as well as some > folks who are depending on the cadence, like IoT, it was clear we need > to look at this option. For now, I intend to remove the cadence change > from the objective requirements, unless more specific reasons why it > has to happen become clear.
It's getting to be time to lay out the F31 schedule. Let's go ahead with the assumption that we'll use the regular end-of-October target. -- Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
