On Tue, 2019-01-15 at 10:40 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > Ooookkkkaaayyyy... > > So this has been around since at least 2017 and there's no fix?
Much longer than that. At least since 2012, probably earlier. %exclude is discouraged, which is why it doesn't seem to have higher priority. See also: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878863 (Although that bug is a little confusing since it seems to mix up two issues with exclude files and build-id symlinks.) It is a variant of: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/284 The fix for that excludes debug files for files which were excluded in the non-debug package. A similar fix should be done for generating the build-ids only for binaries not in the pkg->fileExcludeList. Currently the generateBuildIDs () function in build/files.c only gets the full package file list. It probably should also get the fileExcludeList and only generate the build-id links for files not on that list. The interaction between the different package lists is a little confusing though. It is probably best to ask for guidance on the upstream mailinglist rpm-ma...@lists.rpm.org (CCed). > Is there an option to make it a warning again instead of an error? I don't think without disabling build-ids completely. Cheers, Mark _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
