On 1/20/19 2:27 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Also, please attach your spec file and srpm to the bug. Don't use url > obfuscators and don't use external hosting (people want to see where > the links go without following them, and we want those files to be > available infinitely, and external file hosting goes against this). > I did not know that we shouldn't use external hosting, the wiki [1] also doesn't require that, it only says: > Put your spec file and SRPM somewhere on the Internet where it can be > directly downloaded (just HTTP(s), no registration pages or special download > methods, please). While I see that having them available infinitely has a benefit, it's not enforced anywhere (and actually uncommon for the reviews I've seen). Maybe the guidelines need an update, if that's actually something we want to have? Kind regards Till [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
