Am Montag, den 21.01.2019, 15:16 -0500 schrieb Ben Cotton: > * Proposal owners: > Build gcc in f30, rebuild packages that have direct dependencies on > exact gcc version (libtool, annobin, gcc-python-plugin).
Did not happen. Rawhide buildroot was broken yesterday around 9:50 UTC. I was doing the rebuilds about one hour *after* GCC-9 was build, just to have a working buildroot on Koji again [1]. gcc-python-plugin wasn't rebuilt until I triggered the build this morning and the package actually is FTBFS due to GCC-9 [2]. This should have been done in a proper chain-build. If the change owner does not have the needed powers for rebuilding other packages, help and coordination from a provenpackager should have been requested *prior* to just dropping in a new major version of GCC. Anyways, the intention to build a new major version of GCC should have been announced at least one week *before* silently dropping it into Rawhide. > == Contingency Plan == > If bugs are discovered, I'd appreciate help from the package owners in > preparing self-contained testcases to speed up analysis and fixing the > bugs. Don't have time to debug issues in > 12000+ packages, especially when in many cases it could be caused by > undefined code in the packages etc. I don't expect we'll have to fall > back to the older gcc, we've never had to do it in the past, > but worst case we can mass rebuild everything with older gcc again. > Jeff Law has performed test mass rebuild on x86_64. Where are the results of that test mass-rebuild to be found? How much is the fallout in these rebuilds? At least one of my critpath packages (libxcrypt) would have been FTBFS due to GCC-9, if I wouldn't have pushed an immediate fix [3]. [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/E5KJUS2VUGKUKODYN7MPFXWBIMR7HZZF/ [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1668175 [3] https://github.com/besser82/libxcrypt/issues/76
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
