On 3/24/19 8:26 PM, John M. Harris, Jr. wrote: > What is the reason for builders running permissive, rather than with a > tailored targeted policy?
Running enforcing caused odd building issues (like the one mentioned in this thread) and it's never been been a priority to spend time to track them all down. Often, because of the unusual env they are don't audit rules, making it anoying to try and fix them. kevin -- > > On March 24, 2019 11:25:14 PM EDT, Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote: >> On 3/24/19 6:57 PM, Jerry James wrote: >>> I ask because the gcl build is failing on every architecture. The >> gcl >>> binary segfaults immediately after it is linked in the first stage, >>> which is what happens if I try to build in mock on my local machine >>> with SELinux in enforcing mode. But if I put SELinux into permissive >>> mode, I can build successfully in mock. >>> >>> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=33751679 >>> >>> Thanks, >> >> Nope. All builders are in permissive mode. >> >> kevin > > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
