Hello

I tested upgrades from F29 to F30. I use the following images:
https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/29/Cloud/x86_64/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-Vagrant-29-1.2.x86_64.vagrant-virtualbox.box
https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/29/Cloud/x86_64/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-29-1.2.x86_64.qcow2

On the image for Vagrant, I failed upgrades  I usually use this image for rpm 
packaging.```
[vagrant@fedora29 ~]$ sudo dnf --releasever=30 
--setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f30 --enablerepo=updates-testing 
distro-sync
Fedora Modular 30 - x86_64                                                      
                                                                  650 kB/s | 
2.3 MB     00:03   
Fedora Modular 30 - x86_64 - Updates                                            
                                                                  219  B/s | 
257  B     00:01   
Fedora 30 - x86_64 - Test Updates                                               
                                                                  1.8 MB/s |  
14 MB     00:07   
Fedora 30 - x86_64 - Updates                                                    
                                                                  234  B/s | 
257  B     00:01   
Fedora 30 - x86_64                                                              
                                                                  1.1 MB/s |  
54 MB     00:48   
Error:
 Problem 1: problem with installed package 
gofed-infra-1.0.0-0.21.rc1.fc29.noarch
  - gofed-infra-1.0.0-0.21.rc1.fc29.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade 
repository
  - nothing provides python2.7dist(git) needed by 
gofed-infra-1.0.0-0.22.rc1.fc30.noarch
  - nothing provides python2.7dist(hglib) needed by 
gofed-infra-1.0.0-0.22.rc1.fc30.noarch
  - nothing provides python2.7dist(koji) needed by 
gofed-infra-1.0.0-0.22.rc1.fc30.noarch
  - nothing provides python2.7dist(python-gitdb) needed by 
gofed-infra-1.0.0-0.22.rc1.fc30.noarch
  - nothing provides python2.7dist(tarfile) needed by 
gofed-infra-1.0.0-0.22.rc1.fc30.noarch
  - nothing provides python2.7dist(urllib2) needed by 
gofed-infra-1.0.0-0.22.rc1.fc30.noarch
 Problem 2: problem with installed package 
gofed-gofedlib-1.0.0-0.21.rc1.fc29.x86_64
  - gofed-gofedlib-1.0.0-0.21.rc1.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade 
repository
  - nothing provides python2.7dist(jinja2) = 2.8 needed by 
gofed-gofedlib-1.0.0-0.22.rc1.fc30.x86_64
  - nothing provides python2.7dist(markupsafe) = 0.23 needed by 
gofed-gofedlib-1.0.0-0.22.rc1.fc30.x86_64
 Problem 3: problem with installed package gofed-1.0.0-0.21.rc1.fc29.x86_64
  - package gofed-1.0.0-0.22.rc1.fc30.x86_64 requires gofed-infra = 
1.0.0-0.22.rc1.fc30, but none of the providers can be installed
  - gofed-1.0.0-0.21.rc1.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
  - nothing provides python2.7dist(git) needed by 
gofed-infra-1.0.0-0.22.rc1.fc30.noarch
  - nothing provides python2.7dist(hglib) needed by 
gofed-infra-1.0.0-0.22.rc1.fc30.noarch
  - nothing provides python2.7dist(koji) needed by 
gofed-infra-1.0.0-0.22.rc1.fc30.noarch
  - nothing provides python2.7dist(python-gitdb) needed by 
gofed-infra-1.0.0-0.22.rc1.fc30.noarch
  - nothing provides python2.7dist(tarfile) needed by 
gofed-infra-1.0.0-0.22.rc1.fc30.noarch
  - nothing provides python2.7dist(urllib2) needed by 
gofed-infra-1.0.0-0.22.rc1.fc30.noarch
 Problem 4: problem with installed package 
gofed-resources-1.0.0-0.21.rc1.fc29.noarch
  - package gofed-resources-1.0.0-0.22.rc1.fc30.noarch requires gofed-gofedlib 
= 1.0.0-0.22.rc1.fc30, but none of the providers can be installed
  - gofed-resources-1.0.0-0.21.rc1.fc29.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade 
repository
  - nothing provides python2.7dist(jinja2) = 2.8 needed by 
gofed-gofedlib-1.0.0-0.22.rc1.fc30.x86_64
  - nothing provides python2.7dist(markupsafe) = 0.23 needed by 
gofed-gofedlib-1.0.0-0.22.rc1.fc30.x86_64
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
```

On the image for OpenStack, dependencies are successfully resolved. 
 ```
Transaction Summary
==================================================================================================================================================================================
Install   20 Packages
Upgrade  392 Packages

...

Total download size: 282 M
Is this ok [y/N]:
Operation aborted.
```

Upgrades are successfully completed while I found scriptlets in dbus-daemon and 
systemd are failed 
because of "Failed to reload daemon: Access denied".```
Transaction Summary
==================================================================================================================================================================================
Install   20 Packages
Upgrade  392 Packages

Total download size: 282 M
Is this ok [y/N]: y

...(snip)...
Upgraded: dbus-daemon-1:1.12.10-1.fc29.x86_64
  Running scriptlet: dbus-daemon-1:1.12.10-1.fc29.x86_64                        
                                                                                
          663/807 
Failed to reload daemon: Access denied
warning: %triggerpostun(systemd-239-3.fc29.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit 
status 1

Error in <unknown> scriptlet in rpm package dbus-daemon
Upgraded: systemd-pam-239-3.fc29.x86_64

...(snip)...
Upgraded: libgcc-8.2.1-2.fc29.x86_64
  Running scriptlet: libgcc-8.2.1-2.fc29.x86_64                                 
                                                                                
          807/807 
  Running scriptlet: filesystem-3.10-1.fc30.x86_64                              
                                                                                
          807/807 
  Running scriptlet: sssd-common-2.1.0-2.fc30.x86_64                            
                                                                                
          807/807 
  Running scriptlet: kernel-core-5.0.7-300.fc30.x86_64                          
                                                                                
          807/807 
  Running scriptlet: rootfiles-8.1-24.fc30.noarch                               
                                                                                
          807/807 
  Running scriptlet: libgcc-8.2.1-2.fc29.x86_64                                 
                                                                                
          807/807 
  Running scriptlet: glibc-common-2.29-9.fc30.x86_64                            
                                                                                
          807/807 
  Running scriptlet: shared-mime-info-1.12-2.fc30.x86_64                        
                                                                                
          807/807 
  Running scriptlet: glib2-2.60.0-3.fc30.x86_64                                 
                                                                                
          807/807 
  Running scriptlet: systemd-241-6.gita2eaa1c.fc30.x86_64                       
                                                                                
          807/807 
Failed to reload daemon: Access denied
warning: %triggerin(systemd-241-6.gita2eaa1c.fc30.x86_64) scriptlet failed, 
exit status 1

Error in <unknown> scriptlet in rpm package systemd
  Running scriptlet: systemd-udev-241-6.gita2eaa1c.fc30.x86_64                  
                                                                                
          807/807 
  Running scriptlet: man-db-2.8.4-4.fc30.x86_64                                 
                                                                                
          807/807 
  Running scriptlet: info-6.6-1.fc30.x86_64  

...(snip)...
Complete!
[fedora@fedora29 ~]$  
```

Best Regards,
Hirotaka Wakabayashi 

    On Thursday, February 28, 2019 6:23 PM, Miroslav Suchý <msu...@redhat.com> 
wrote:
 

 Do you want to make Fedora 30 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and 
try to run:

  sudo dnf --releasever=30 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f30 
--enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync

If you get this prompt:

  ...
  Total download size: XXX M
  Is this ok [y/N]:

you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the real upgrade. 
Upgrades will be fine for you.

But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case please report 
it against appropriate package.

Thank you

Miroslav
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


   
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to