On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 at 07:51, Dan Čermák <dan.cer...@cgc-instruments.com> wrote:
> Hi list, > > I'm co-maintaining a C++ library that has been continuously updated in > CentOS 7 but a recent change made it incompatible with the default GCC > version available in el7. I.e. the next release (scheduled for the end > of 2019) will FTBFS in CentOS/RHEL 7. > > I think this question should be more aimed at the epel-devel list versus the fedora devel list.. EPEL does allow for SCL's to be used for building packages but not for requiring it to be installed. > Would it be fine to require a gcc version from a SCL to build this > library? I'm afraid that due to the nature of C++'s non-standardized ABI > it would require all dependent packages to be rebuild with gcc from the > SCL too. > > Will bow to what Neal and others say on this part. > > Cheers, > > Dan > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- Stephen J Smoogen.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
