On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 8:05 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
<zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 06:29:06AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 5:04 AM Lennart Poettering <mzerq...@0pointer.de> 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On So, 28.04.19 20:55, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi everyone,
> > > >
> > > > currently, we autogenerate a dependency on pkg-config for all rpms
> > > > that ship a .pc file. "dnf repoquery --whatrequires /usr/bin/pkg-config"
> > > > returns 4632 entries on my laptop.
> > >
> > > You probably need some base RPM to own the dir /usr/lib64/pkgconfig then,
> > > which is currently owned by pkgconf-pkg-config, no?
> > >
> >
> > Correct. pkgconf-pkg-config owns all the base paths for pkgconfig content.
>
> Or simply co-own the directory from all packages that put files there.
> Systemd does this already, and explicitly skips the dependency on pkg-config.
>

It does this specifically because a pc file is shipped in the main
package. That's a pretty rare circumstance.



-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to