Last time I was about to propose this in F29, I did mass-rebuild myself and while decompressing was faster in most of the cases, the size was definitely worse. So definitely "Lower bandwidth on mirrors if we choose the highest compression level" is under the question.
I think before approving such changes, owners need to do mass rebuilds on their own and provide a graph of changes in size between original compression format and new one(s). Just saying it works better on Firefox doesn't sound to me like the way to go. On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 10:21 PM Ben Cotton <bcot...@redhat.com> wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Switch_RPMs_to_zstd_compression > > = Switch RPMs to zstd compression = > > == Summary == > Binary RPMs are currently compressed with xz level 2. > Switching to zstd would increase decompression speed significantly. > > == Owner == > * Name: [[User:dmach| Daniel Mach]] > * Email: dm...@redhat.com > > == Detailed Description == > * The change requires setting a new compression algorithm in rpm > macros. Then a mass rebuild of all packages is required. > * The macro for setting the compression is: %define _binary_payload > w19.zstdio > * The recommended compression level is 19. The builds will take > longer, but the additional compression time is negligible in the total > build time and it pays off in better compression ratio than xz lvl2 > has. > * SRPM payload compression should stay at gzip (there's almost no > benefit in changing the compression, because SRPM's contents is > compressed already) > > === Use case: Firefox installation === > I rebuilt firefox-66.0.5-1.fc30 with zstd level19. > Then I compared installation times with the original (xz compressed) > package: > > {| class="wikitable" > |- > ! Compression !! Target File System !! Time > |- > | xz level 2 || tmpfs || 8s > |- > | xz level 2 || ext4 on nvme || 11s > |- > | zstd level 19 || tmpfs || 2s > |- > | zstd level 19 || ext4 on nvme || 4s > |- > |} > > > === Comparison of compression algorithms and levels === > Following table shows '''cpio''' and '''compressed cpio''' extraction > times into a tmpfs. Actual times in decompressing RPMs will differ due > to extracting on an actual disk and also some overhead in the RPM tool > (checks, scriptlets). > > {| class="wikitable" > |- > ! Compression !! Level !! Size B !! Size GiB > !! Compression time !! Compression time, 4 threads !! > Decompression time !! Comment > |- > | CPIO || - || 5016785692 || 4,7 > || - || - || - > || > |- > | xz || 2 || 1615017616 || 1,6 > || 9m55s || - || 1m36s > || slow decompression > |- > | pxz || 2 || 1631869880 || 1,6 > || - || 6m11s || 1m38s > || slow decompression > |- > | gzip || 9 || 2086354992 || 2,0 > || 10m23s || - || 31s > || insufficient compression ratio > |- > | bzip2 || 9 || 1889161565 || 1,8 > || 8m || - || 2m50s > || very slow decompression; compression ratio could be > better > |- > | zstd || 3 || 1913536587 || 1,8 > || 31s || 29s || 6,5s > || > |- > | zstd || 10 || 1737928978 || 1,7 > || 3m27s || 2m34s || 6,3s > || > |- > | zstd || 15 || 1717303256 || 1,7 > || 9m37s || 6m34s || 6,3s > || identical compression speed to xz; fast decompression; > slightly worse compression ratio than xz > |- > | zstd || 17 || 1635525492 || 1,6 > || 16m16s || 11m20s || 6,7s > || > |- > | zstd || 19 || 1575843696 || 1,5 > || 24m2s || 18m55s || 7,7s > || > |- > |} > > == Benefit to Fedora == > * Faster installations/upgrades of user systems > * Faster koji builds (installations in build roots) > * Faster container builds > * Lower bandwidth on mirrors if we choose the highest compression level > > == Scope == > * Proposal owners: submit a patch to redhat-rpm-config > * Other developers: redhat-rpm-config maintainer: include the patch > and make a new build > * Release engineering: [https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8345 #8345] > mass rebuild is needed > > == Upgrade/compatibility impact == > * RPM in Fedora supports zstd compression already (from Fedora 28, > rpm-4.14.0-0.rc2.5.fc28). No impact on Fedora users is expected. > * Fedora <= 27 and some other distros will not be able to decompress > zstd-compressed RPMs. > > == How To Test == > * dnf install <package> > * rpm -q --qf "%{PAYLOADCOMPRESSOR} %{PAYLOADFLAGS}\n" <package> > * expected output: zstd 19 > > Also the overall system installation time should decrease significantly. > > == User Experience == > See '''Benefit to Fedora''' > > == Dependencies == > N/A > > == Contingency Plan == > * Contingency mechanism: Not needed, Fedora will stay at current > compression. > * Contingency deadline: N/A > * Blocks release? No > * Blocks product? N/A > > == Documentation == > N/A > > == Release Notes == > RPMs have switched to zstd compression level 19. > Users will benefit from faster package decompression. > Users that build their packages will experience slightly longer build > times. > > -- > Ben Cotton > He / Him / His > Fedora Program Manager > Red Hat > TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis > _______________________________________________ > devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to > devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
