On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 10:10 AM Miro Hrončok <mhron...@redhat.com> wrote: > > No, we keep everything called python3, we just provide the "python" name. > With python2 -> python3, one of the problems was that everything was just > called > "python" before. We are not proposing to start doing that again. All packages > still need to eb called python3-foo, ale package still need to use python3-foo > dependencies and all packages still need to invoke "python3" explicitly. > But if everything should refer to python3 explicitly, what's the benefit of having the unversioned Python? I understand why it's better to have python mean python3 instead of python2, but I don't understand why it's better than not having it.
-- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Fedora Program Manager Red Hat TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
