On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 7:41 PM Stephen John Smoogen <smo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 at 18:49, Neal Gompa <ngomp...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> > What about postponing this change to F32? I'd prefer python2 to be >> > retired and gone from the distro first, and the symlink and >> > %python_provide definition only switched then. I think that having >> > this middle state where python2 is available but python points to >> > python3 for exactly one release will be more confusing that switching >> > directly to the final state where python2 is gone and python simply >> > means python3. >> > >> >> I think it makes sense to make the switch before we retire, because >> then people's expectations are changed ahead of time and they can >> adapt to The Future(TM). >> > > Actually I think it makes more sense that F31 provides no /usr/bin/python. > Then a lot of things which depend on it can be found and fixed since they > have not adapted to the Future any other way. >
We've been throwing errors on using /usr/bin/python in packaged code since Fedora 28, so I don't think it's necessary to wait like that. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
