On 09. 08. 19 21:10, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 8/9/19 11:02 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
The FTBFS bug was set to ASSIGNED yet your script retired it.
Correct. It was still failing to build.
I misinterpreted the "retire if still failing to build". This is new and
unexpected.
It is not that new, it just didn't happen for several years because nobody did
it.
It is not reasonable to place a hard timeline on a single person for
a huge package such as wine gecko.
What would you want to do instead? Keep shipping th Fedora 26 package forever?
Is there nobody who is interested in winde and could help?
Wine users need this package to prevent Wine from downloading Gecko from the
Internet.
The reasons for the FTBFS have been stated in the bug.
While I would love to fix every FTBFS issue overnight sometimes it just
doesn't work that way.
Overnight? The latest build is from 2016-11-24.
Here's the latest update on it, which I will also append to the bug report.
https://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2019-August/149411.html
Thanks.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
