Dne 14. 08. 19 v 15:20 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): > On 14. 08. 19 14:55, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> I think it would be probably enough to stop here. Orphaned packages gets >> garbage collected ATM. The step 4 was a bit unexpected for packages with >> bugs in ASSIGNED state especially. > > If we stop here, the current "setting to ASSIGNED to stop this" > remains a problem.
It depends. I agree that this might prevent some packages from removing immediately. OTOH, the FTBFS package is reported with every mass rebuild, i.e. every 6 months. So if something changes in these 6+ months, the new ticket will eventually stay in NEW and the package will be orphaned and later garbage collected ... Vít _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
