On 8/26/19 7:57 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Kaleb Keithley:
> 
>> `dnf update` on my f32/rawhide machine is giving me:
>>
>> Problem 1: conflicting requests
>>   - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module 
>> bat:latest:3120190714171319:22d7e2a5-0.x86_64
>>  Problem 2: conflicting requests
>>   - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module 
>> exa:latest:3120190721165838:22d7e2a5-0.x86_64
>>  Problem 3: conflicting requests
>>   - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module 
>> libgit2:0.28:3120190714114509:f636be4b-0.x86_64
>>  Problem 4: conflicting requests
>>   - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module 
>> silver:rolling:3120190728135623:22d7e2a5-0.x86_64
>>
>> What do I need to do for this?
> 
> I also see this with
> 
>   dnf distrosync --releasever=31
> 
> on Fedora 30.  Is this expected?

Can you expand on what you mean there?

This is a fedora 30 machine you are upgrading to 31 with distrosync and
it shows this in the distro-sync output before you say 'y'? or ?

module(platform:fN) should be provided by fedora-release-whatever-N so
yeah, on upgrades with distro-sync you will see that until you have the
fedora 31 fedora-release installed or unless you pass:

--setopt='module_platform_id=platform:f31' on the distro sync.

dnf system-upgrade is supposed to not need this anymore and do the right
thing.

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to