On 03/09/19 18:34 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 03/09/19 09:57 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 7:37 AM Michael J Gruber <m...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
This is to let you know that I intend to orphan dblatex.
Note that the gcc package uses dblatex to build libstdc++
documentation. We as a project need to figure out what to do about
dblatex's python 2 dependency.
I don't think it's used in Fedora actually. I'm pretty sure it's only
used to generate the PDF version of the libstdc++ manual hosted on the
gcc.gnu.org website. Those PDF files aren't packaged for Fedora. I
think we can try just dropping the BuildRequires and see if it still
builds. And if not, what needs to be changed to get it building again.
For the upstream docs I'll look into using fop instead of dblatex.
An x86_64 scratch build with this change completed successfully:
--- a/gcc.spec
+++ b/gcc.spec
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ Requires: libisl.so.15
%endif
%if %{build_libstdcxx_docs}
BuildRequires: doxygen >= 1.7.1
-BuildRequires: graphviz, dblatex, texlive-collection-latex, docbook5-style-xsl
+BuildRequires: graphviz, texlive-collection-latex, docbook5-style-xsl
%endif
Requires: cpp = %{version}-%{release}
# Need .eh_frame ld optimizations
So the dblatex dependency can just be dropped from gcc.spec, which
Jakub said he'll take care of when he updates it next.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
