On 9/9/19 3:35 PM, vvs vvs wrote:
> So, you are insisting that Koji just doesn't work without any assistance? And 
> that it's impossible to build a separate i686 repository without affecting 
> all others?

We used to build secondary architectures separately, using koji-shadow
to chase the primary builds. This had plenty of problems of its own. You
can read a bit below, and maybe others can provide more history.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/RedefiningSecondaryArchitectures

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/3BO5E2XZ2D7BHK7GQXZB5S37AQIUN6YP/#ZYYG7RP754ONDU4T7DVFQ5U6YAXWSH55


> And that you can't exclude that architecture for a specific package?

You can, but if everyone gets free license to ignore i686, I think it
won't be long before you find yourself without some key packages.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to