On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 07:28:37 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 4:50 AM Kevin Kofler <kevin.kof...@chello.at> wrote: > > > I do not know the details well enough to be able to decide which is the > better way here. Both should be doable in principle. > > > As the maintainer of OpenImageIO I agree with Kevin, I'm OK with either, but > one thing I would ask upstream is why they bumped soname on a patch level > version increase...
Yes---confused me too. I'll ask them this when I e-mail them next. > With my packages I would typically update all released Fedora versions for > patch level updates, but I also frequently build the package myself and run > abi-compliance-checker or fedabipkgdiff on it to make sure things like soname > bumps don't sneak in... The changes from 3.6.2 to 3.6.4 do mention a few API changes, not too clearly though, in their release announcements/changelogs: https://github.com/DCMTK/dcmtk/tree/master/docs There is no mention of ABI changes there. I did run abipkgdiff, and this is what it gave me: https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/misc/dcmtk-3.6.2-3.6.4-abipkgdiff.txt It doesn't pick up any changes in the shared objects (can it, if the version has been changed?). I'm not experienced enough with these reports. Does that look OK? For the time being I'm going to backport the patch and push an update as Mamoru suggested, simply because it's less work and quicker. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
