On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 3:48 AM Kevin Kofler <kevin.kof...@chello.at> wrote: > > Fabio Valentini wrote: > > To make things even more interesting, the non-modular Java stack has > > almost reached parity with what's available from the shiny module > > branches, except a handful of packages that require more work than a > > simple "bump version and build" (for example, the rebase from maven > > 3.5 to 3.6 is still pending, but I'm planning to work on that soon). > > Does that include Eclipse, where the packagers recently announced that it > would become module-only? > > (That said, all the Java projects I work with are set up for NetBeans, so I > don't really use Eclipse anyway. I'm just asking for curiosity. Sadly, the > NetBeans Fedora package was abandoned long ago, long before Modularity has > become a thing, so that one is a wholly different story.)
No, it doesn't include eclipse. We aren't interested in maintaining it, and certainly don't have the manpower to do it. Fabio > Kevin Kofler > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
