* Jerry James: > On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 8:25 PM Jerry James <loganje...@gmail.com> wrote: >> The previous build managed to grab the last build of glibc32 for >> s390x, it seems. I'm going to assume that this means that s390x >> should be removed from the multilib_64_arches variable in the gcc >> spec, just so I can keep these builds going. (There are at least 3 >> days of builds still to go.) If that is wrong, please let me know >> ASAP so I can make it right before anything lands in Rawhide. > > Sadly, simply removing s390x from multilib_64_arches was insufficient. > > In file included from /usr/include/features.h:489, > from /usr/include/bits/libc-header-start.h:33, > from /usr/include/stdio.h:27, > from ../../../../libgcc/../gcc/tsystem.h:87, > from ../../../../libgcc/libgcov.h:42, > from ../../../../libgcc/libgcov-merge.c:26: > /usr/include/gnu/stubs.h:8:11: fatal error: gnu/stubs-32.h: No such > file or directory > 8 | # include <gnu/stubs-32.h> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > compilation terminated. > make[5]: *** [Makefile:920: _gcov_merge_add.o] Error 1 > > > So does that mean that glibc has to be rebuilt first, with s390 and > s390x removed from biarcharches?
Sorry, I wasn't aware that you were trying to rebuild gcc this week. I spoke to Jakub about the glibc32 change, and he had no objections. It's not clear how you are handling the transition. Why do you need to change GCC build requirements? Did anyone request this? I would have expected a run-time-only compat-mpfr library with the old soname, so that GCC keeps working until it is rebuilt. Thanks, Florian _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
