On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 8:31 AM Kevin Kofler <kevin.kof...@chello.at> wrote:
> Sorry, but I'm with Vít there. If Python is running into toolchain > limitations, the goal should be to work on improving the toolchain, not to > add a hack with side effects (bloat, compatibility issues) to the Python > package, a hack with which we will then get stuck with forever (because > you > admitted yourself that you do not intend it to be temporary). How is statically linked libpython hack? It's just a different way to do it, isn't it? And if toolchain needs some improving, fine, but why should we have lower performance and keep waiting on it if there is a solution available right now? Solution that's been tested and proven to work in other high profile Distributions (Ubuntu, Debian). And size increase? It's so tiny, I can't imagine why should that matter at all. Also, this is change to Python ecosystem in Fedora, it does not depend on Ruby, Perl and others. Anyhow, I am very much for this proposal.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
