On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 12:11 PM Charalampos Stratakis
<cstra...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Stephen Gallagher" <sgall...@redhat.com>
> > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" 
> > <devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > Cc: "Mat Booth" <mbo...@fedoraproject.org>, 
> > protobuf-mainatin...@fedoraproject.org
> > Sent: Friday, December 6, 2019 5:59:50 PM
> > Subject: Re: Fedora 31: dnf upgrade suddenly enables modular streams for 
> > protobuf
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 11:51 AM Igor Gnatenko
> > <ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks for CCing me (maintainer of protobuf here), I am particularly
> > > not happy that some module (which is not even called protobuf, but
> > > some random Java #$%! with ripped out python support overrides my
> > > builds).
> > >
> > > I have put a proposal into a FESCo ticket.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 5:44 PM Miro Hrončok <mhron...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Today I've attempted to run "dnf upgrade".
> > > >
> > > > It has the following in it:
> > > >
> > > > Upgrading:
> > > > protobuf  x86_64  3.6.1-6.module_f31+6793+1c93c38e  updates-modular
> > > >
> > > > Enabling module streams:
> > > >   ant
> > > >   eclipse
> > > >   maven
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I don't consider this behavior adequate for a released Fedora version.
> > > >
> > > > As a maintainer of dependent packages (Cura stack) I have tested and
> > > > built it
> > > > against the nonmodular protobuf. What just happened here and how do I
> > > > track it down?
> > > >
> > > > dnf doesn't even tell me what module is this in. I suppose eclipse.
> > > >
> > > > However, protobuf was not mentioned in 
> > > > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2285
> > > >
> >
> >
> > For the record, I've just pushed a temporary removal of the eclipse
> > default stream, so the next compose will not have it. For those of you
> > who are affected, your best bet would be to use `yum history rollback`
> > and wait to update again until tomorrow.
>
> I got affected as well and I guess a big number of people also.
>
> Is it safe to assume that with the next compose the extra modules will be 
> disabled/removed when doing a dnf update? Or do we need to rollback the 
> update?
>

No, the extra modules won't be disabled/removed automatically. The
change I made is to ensure no one else gets hit. You will need to roll
back the update if you were affected.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to