On Tue, 2020-01-21 at 13:47 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 01:42:25PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > I've seen this issue pop up in some other packages, as well. > > > > My elementary-files package is affected, and I think it broke > > rubygem-ffi, too (which is blocking the ruby 2.7 rebuild, breaking a > > lot of ruby packages; though I can't access the build log for the > > failed rubygem-ffi build, due to a koji bug relating to side tags). > > Yes, it should affect around 400 packages in the distro from what I remember > from Jeff's test mass rebuild, other distros are aware of it too and the > fixes just need to be pushed upstream or grabber from upstream if they are > there already. > Adding -fcommon is a temporary workaround but fixing the packages is > preferred, especially if those fixes end up upstream. Right. It was ~450. The SuSE team in particular has had reasonable success getting fixes upstreamed -- I think Martin L indicated they'd gotten a few dozen fixed upstream.
ISTM that fixing upstream is by far the best choice followed by fixing with a Fedora patch. Working around via an opt-out or modifying the flags in a .spec file is the least desirable. Jeff _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
