> >> And any discussion of GitHub isn't going to involve self-hosted, it's
> >> going to involve GitHub.com, which means we're talking about losing
> >> more of our independence as a project. This is one of those things
> >> that I'm not sure is a wise move.
> >
> > Well since we have a request for requirements: I propose requirements
> > #1 and #2 are to be self-hosted and open source. I'm suspect the
> > Fedora community would be outraged if we fail to meet either requirement.
>
> I second this.  FOSS is what's allowed RedHat to succeed and it would
> really suck to see Fedora switch to a closed source platform that's
> owned by Microsoft...
>
> Also, as somebody who runs a self hosted pagure server I would really
> hate to see pagure go away.  I understand Pingou may not have the time
> to work on the project as in the past but the torch should definitely be
> passed to somebody else or the community to continue work on the project.

It's open source now so what's stopping people/companies using it now
from contributing rather than relying on Pingou? Similarly if it
ceases to be a core piece of infrastructure for Fedora there's nothing
stopping the pagure community to continue it's development.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to