On Monday, February 10, 2020 12:03:25 PM MST Robbie Harwood wrote:
> "John M. Harris Jr" <joh...@splentity.com> writes:
> > On Saturday, January 25, 2020 2:52:05 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote:
> >> Question and (pre)proposal:
> >> 
> >> Can Fedora converge on a single swap-on-ZRAM implementation, and if
> >> so, which one? Fedora Workstation WG wants to move to swap-on-ZRAM by
> >> default in Fedora 33, and the working group needs to pick something
> >> soon.
> > 
> > Using swap on zram disables the ability to hibernate, making it a
> > non-starter for many users. If this is going to be thrown into
> > anything, the user needs to be asked whether they want it or not in
> > the installer, otherwise you're just taking away features.
> 
> I thought you told me that the workstation group considers hibernation
> unsupported?  (id:2368390.zu9c8gp...@marvin.jharris.pw)
> 
> Thanks,
> --Robbie

They do, but that doesn't negate the fact that it is actually supported (you 
can hibernate your system), and using swap on zram outright breaks hibernation 
(for obvious reasons).

-- 
John M. Harris, Jr.
Splentity

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to