On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 07:41:56AM -0000, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Hm, I'm not seeing these orphaned and I pretty sure I have never maintained > > them: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-IO-Socket-Timeout > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-PerlIO-via-Timeout > > > > bug in the script? > > They have been since adapted by @pghmcfc. > > You have never maintained them, but your package depends on them: > > perl-Redis requires perl(IO::Socket::Timeout) > gitolite3 requires perl(Redis) > pagure requires gitolite3 > > (Also perl-IO-Socket-Timeout requires perl(PerlIO::via::Timeout).) > > No bug in the script. Although not the first "I have never maintained those" > reaction at all. How to make it easier to understand by affected maintainers?
The top of the section says: "Affected (co)maintainers", so I took it as I am a co-maintainer of that package and thus I'm affected by it being orphaned. Maybe simply saying: "Affected (co)maintainers (either directly or via packages' dependencies)" would make it clearer that the list takes into account the dependency tree. I think the best/clearer output may just be something like: pingou: perl-IO-Socket-Timeout (in the dependency tree for pagure), foo (in the dependency tree for bar)... but it may be too much pain for the gain. Pierre _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
