Please excuse me going completely offtopic here - for some reason I'm getting this thread addressed directly to me. If someone's adding me as bcc please don't, I have nothing to do with this.
Thanks, Radka ------------------------------ *Radka Janeková (she/her)* .NET Core QE Lead, Red Hat *radka.ja...@redhat.com <radka.ja...@redhat.com>* IRC: radka | Freenode: Rhea On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 10:02 AM Ankur Sinha <sanjay.an...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 17:07:21 -0500, Dakota Williams via devel wrote: > > On 2/26/20 6:59 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > <snip> > > > > > > > > Would you like help? I'd be willing to be a co-maintainer to make the > > > > branch. > > > > > > Yes, I would welcome help with these packages > > > > > > But there is also an increasing problem of making decisions about trust > > > > > > In the case of developers who I haven't met or worked with, I don't > > > really know how to proceed > > > > > > I've seen several extraordinary examples of developers doing things > that > > > undermine my confidence in them over the last couple of years. The > > > fighting within GNU and FSF right now is the latest iteration of that. > > > > > > Now, whenever I receive a request from somebody I don't know, there is > > > an extra effort for me to decide how to proceed. > > > > > > Maybe I can simply resign from maintaining the asio package and then > opt > > > out of the process of choosing a new maintainer. > > > > > > Please don't take this personally: it is a reflection of the overall > > > state of free software communities today. > > > > > I don't know about the situation with the GNU project and the FSF, but if > > there's something you'd like me to do to prove trust, I could do it. > > I'd like to add that by default we trust each other, in the spirit of > being excellent to each other. In this particular case, > co-maintainership shares responsibility but does not hand it over > completely (the handing-over bit can be done at a later stage, if > necessary). Every change/commit/message is public, so there are plenty > of opportunities to catch any errors. > > Given that we do not often meet our Fedora colleagues in person, it is > not viable to expect members of the community to prove trustworthiness > through personal relationships. We assume the best in each other, and if > things do get hairy, we have open community channels, processes, and > overseeing bodies through which changes can be emended. > > -- > Thanks, > Regards, > Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha > Time zone: Europe/London > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
