On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 11:23:59AM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Tue, 5 May 2020 at 10:33, Pierre-Yves Chibon <pin...@pingoured.fr> wrote: > > > > The scripts syncing information from dist-git to bugzilla have been broken > > for a > > long time (less than 5 years though) and we've picked them up, fixed and > > clean > > them so they work again. > > This has been announced here and on devel-announce over the past few months > > (including an email from yesterday about the move of the bugzilla overrides > > to > > dist-git itself). > > > > So after looking at the bug above (the only package I could find in this > > thread), I went to: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/claws-mail clicked > > "Edit" > > on the left hand side column and changed the bugzilla assignee in EPEL to > > `orphan`. At the next run of the script, the EPEL tickets will be > > re-assigned to > > orphan. > > > > Now I ran into this thread a little bit by chance while checking my emails. > > If > > you have such issue in the future you may want to actually report it, ie: > > open a > > ticket on https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues so we can either > > fix > > the bug if there is one or tell explain how the situation can be adjusted. > > None of that explains why and when I've been assigned to EPEL packages. > This is a thread from January. > > It's the same with all other packages. The web page you refer to now > explicitly > claims that somebody is a "Bugzilla Assignee" for EPEL even if a package > isn't available in the EPEL dist
That is correct and we'll need to adjust this in the future. Pierre _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
