On 10. 05. 20 0:09, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
On Saturday, May 9, 2020 2:40:02 PM MST Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 09. 05. 20 22:56, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
On Wednesday, April 29, 2020 3:38:36 PM MST Miro Hrončok wrote:
The command that the user executes is "python3.9", not "python39".
Let's be realistic. The command they run is 'python', 'python2' or
'python3'. Sure, it's a symlink, but that's what users actually type to
be executed.
The entire point of packaging Python 3.5, 3.6, 3.7, 3.8 and 3.9 is to
support users who need to be that explicit. The fact that you don't
consider this use case dos not justify the "let's be realistic" comment.
Please, don't.
In every environment I've seen a specific version used, the primary symlink is
updated to point to the version that's supported or being used. For example,
at work engineers asked for Python 2.7 to be installed on all of the systems
in a given department, so my team installed the SCL, created a wrapper and
updated the symlink 'python' to point to it.
Good for you. How does that support your argument?
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
