And is applying the workaround just for Fedora 31 tolerated ?

----- Mail original -----
De: "Vascom" <vasc...@gmail.com>
À: "Development discussions related to Fedora" <devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>
Envoyé: Dimanche 31 Mai 2020 12:13:58
Objet: Re: Packaging problem



I think Qt will not be upgraded in F31. 


You can just skip build for F31 and make package for F32 and rawhide only. 


вс, 31 мая 2020 г., 13:08 < ycollette.nos...@free.fr >: 


I tested with Fedora 31 and, it hangs. 
I works fine with Fedora 32. 

I report this problem to Jamulus or to Qt ? I think this problem is already 
fixed on Fedora 32. 

Does a Qt5 update is programmed for Fedora 31 ? 

----- Mail original ----- 
De: "Vascom" < vasc...@gmail.com > 
À: "Development discussions related to Fedora" < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org 
> 
Envoyé: Dimanche 31 Mai 2020 11:50:49 
Objet: Re: Packaging problem 



You should report upstream about the problem and fix code. 


вс, 31 мая 2020 г., 12:49 < ycollette.nos...@free.fr >: 


Hello again ! 

I've got a new problem: a gcc flags trigger a problem during generation of an 
object file. 
The application is based on Qt5. The problematic file is produced from a moc 
generated file. 
The flag in question: -fcf-protection 

The solution I found is to send a custom set of flags to qmake. 

What is the best approach to remove a flags from a rpm macro variable ? 


# optflags %{__global_compiler_flags} -m64 -mtune=generic 
-fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection 
# -fcf-protection produce an error in an object generatoin ... 

qmake-qt5 Jamulus.pro \ 
QMAKE_CFLAGS_DEBUG="%{__global_compiler_flags} -m64 -mtune=generic 
-fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection" \ 
QMAKE_CFLAGS_RELEASE="%{__global_compiler_flags} -m64 -mtune=generic 
-fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection" \ 
QMAKE_CXXFLAGS_DEBUG="%{__global_compiler_flags} -m64 -mtune=generic 
-fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection" \ 
QMAKE_CXXFLAGS_RELEASE="%{__global_compiler_flags} -m64 -mtune=generic 
-fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection" \ 
CONFIG+=opus_shared_lib 

%make_build VERBOSE=1 



----- Mail original ----- 
De: "ycollette nospam" < ycollette.nos...@free.fr > 
À: "Development discussions related to Fedora" < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org 
> 
Envoyé: Samedi 30 Mai 2020 21:58:55 
Objet: Re: Packaging problem 

OK, thanks, it works with %{qmake_qt5} but not with %_qt5_qmake ... 

Thanks a lot 

I see that qmake_qt5 macro call _qt5_qmake with some flags ... 
I found the macro via rpm --showrc | grep qmake and I choose the wrong result. 


----- Mail original ----- 
De: "Vascom" < vasc...@gmail.com > 
À: "Development discussions related to Fedora" < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org 
> 
Envoyé: Samedi 30 Mai 2020 21:49:46 
Objet: Re: Packaging problem 

First you should use this macro %{qmake_qt5} and remove %{set_build_flags}. 

And show your spec or give srpm. 

сб, 30 мая 2020 г. в 22:21, < ycollette.nos...@free.fr >: 
> 
> Hello, 
> 
> I've got a problem with a package. 
> I am trying to clean up a spec file before sending it to review and I've got 
> an error: 
> 
> erreur : Empty %files file 
> /home/artelys/rpmbuild/BUILD/jamulus-c6b6e3ab02d7ec1e93edeeb8042a89a561924826/debugsourcefiles.list
>  
> 
> The code is Qt-5 / c++. It's an application which allows to perform live 
> rehearsale via an internet connection. 
> 
> On the gcc / c++ command line, I can see the -g flags. 
> 
> The build section: 
> 
> %{set_build_flags} 
> 
> %_qt5_qmake Jamulus.pro CONFIG+=opus_shared_lib 
> 
> %make_build VERBOSE=1 
> 
> The install section (the qmake file defines no install rule so I must install 
> everything manually): 
> 
> %__install -m 755 -d %{buildroot}/%{_bindir}/ 
> %__install -m 755 Jamulus %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/jamulus 
> 
> %__install -m 755 -d %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/applications/ 
> %__install -m 644 distributions/jamulus.desktop 
> %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/ 
> 
> %__install -m 755 -d %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/pixmaps/ 
> %__install -m 644 distributions/jamulus.png %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/pixmaps/ 
> 
> How can I build the debug part of the package ? 
> 
> The only solution I've found is to add: 
> 
> %global debug_package %{nil} 
> 
> At the beginning of the spec file ... 
> 
> Best regards, 
> 
> YC 
> _______________________________________________ 
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org 
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ 
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines 
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org 
_______________________________________________ 
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org 
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ 
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines 
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org 
_______________________________________________ 
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org 
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ 
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines 
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org 
_______________________________________________ 
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org 
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ 
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines 
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org 

_______________________________________________ 
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org 
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ 
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines 
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org 
_______________________________________________ 
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org 
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ 
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines 
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org 

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to