On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 07:29:54PM +0200, Igor Raits wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > On Wed, 2020-06-03 at 18:42 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Other possibility is to modify DNF to not touch such packages. Not > > sure > > if that would be better. Or is there already some functionality which > > would exclude the package from dnf transaction, something like: > > > > ~~~ > > # This package won't be installed, but will obsolete other packages > > Provides: libsolv-self-destruct-pkg() > > > > ~~~ > > > > we use in fedora-obsolete-packages? > > Since they do not block the upgrades, does it really matter? However, I > agree that DNF removing packages that are not present in upgrade repo > and blocking the upgrade, should be removed automatically. > That's the distinction between upgrade and distro-sync.
-- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
