On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 12:47 AM Chris Murphy <li...@colorremedies.com> wrote:
>
> Other work is needed in this area, for example installations on UEFI
> don't automatically create two EFI system partitions, so there aren't
> two bootloaders or NVRAM entries. There's a hack/workaround that
> upstream linux-raid@ doesn't like, where md raid1 is used for the ESP,
> etc. /boot/efi should just go away entirely. There is no good reason
> for bootloader volumes being persistently mounted, they aren't user
> domain anyway, users shouldn't have to know about such things or
> repair them or sync them. I don't think it's in the initial mandate
> but something like this might be possible with the new bootupd
> project.
> https://github.com/coreos/bootupd
>

We'd have to stop installing files into /boot directly with RPM for
that sort of thing. While that would be beneficial for a whole host of
reasons, I am unsure how easy it would be to make that change.



-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to