On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 10:26 am, Stephen Gallagher <sgall...@redhat.com> wrote:
For the record, as this directly affects the Workstation deliverable,
I will be voting -1 until and unless the Workstation WG votes in
favor.

Yes, it's a large set of Change owners, but since only two of them are
Workstation WG members, they are not representative of that group.

Workstation WG hat on:

I don't think there's any need to vote -1 for that reason alone. The Workstation WG has discussed the change proposal at several meetings recently (really, we've spent a long time on this), and frankly we were not making a ton of progress towards reaching a decision either way, so going forward with the change proposal and moving the discussion to devel@ to get feedback from a wider audience and from FESCo seemed like a good idea. Most likely, we'll wind up doing whatever FESCo chooses here, but unless FESCo were to explicitly indicate intent to override the Workstation WG, we would not consider a FESCo decision to limit what the Workstation WG can do with the Workstation product. At least, my understanding of the power structure FESCo has established is that the WG can make product-specific decisions that differ from FESCo's decisions whenever we want, unless FESCo says otherwise (because FESCo always has final say). That is, if FESCo were to approve btrfs by default, but Workstation WG were to vote to stick with ext4, then we would stick with ext4 unless FESCo were to say "no really, you need to switch to btfs" (which I highly doubt would happen). So I don't see any reason to vote -1 here out of concern for overriding the WG.

Michael

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to