On Sunday, July 5, 2020 8:12:33 AM MST Markus Larsson wrote: > I have no problem with GRUB2 or sd-boot. I have much more problems with > refind and their ilk. While things can look pretty, that's fine, as soon as > it gets in my way when I try to get things done it stops being fine.
I don't think there's anything visually wrong with systemd-boot, so long as it's showing a menu like gummiboot did. > As I said earlier, I have no problems with sd-boot or the looks of it (it > seems that is what we are discussing now). I see no real problems with > using it as default for EFI systems. That's just an opinion though. It does > what it does and shows what is needed. Actually, it doesn't do enough to be able to actually boot Fedora systems. Please note that full disk encryption is a supported scenario in Fedora, as is encrypted /boot or /boot on Btrfs. systemd-boot is not capable of getting bootloader configuration files in this case, so your system will never boot. As for making it the default, I can't see any reason to do that. Standardizing on the best bootloader seems like the safe bet, i.e. use GRUB2 everywhere possible, and support boot from u-boot, zipl, petitboot, etc. where it's not available. -- John M. Harris, Jr. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
