On 7/9/20 9:15 PM, Josef Bacik wrote: > On 7/9/20 9:30 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
... >>> This test is run constantly by us, specifically because it's the error >>> cases that get you. But not for crash consistency reasons, because we're >>> solid there. I run them to make sure I don't have stupid things like >>> reference leaks or whatever in the error path. Thanks, >> >> or "corrupted!" printk()s that terrify the hapless user? ;) > > I'd love to know what hapless user is running xfstests. Thanks, *sigh* the point is, telling the user "your filesystem is corrupted" if it's not actually corrupted is bad news. Discovering that communication problem via xfstests does not make the concern less valid. I was trying to gently tease you that the test not only discovers leaks, but also discovers terrifyingly inaccurate messages in response to IO errors, but I guess that didn't come through. Thanks. -Eric _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
