> > > > What would help would be if someone could untag that version of 
> > > > binutils so that
> > > > it doesn't show up in the buildroots anymore.  It's clearly fubar'd.
> > >
> > > Done.
> >
> > Hmmmm.  Yet my most recent build attempt, just now, failed with a
> > linker segfault on all arches:
> >
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1546752
> >
> > This is with:
> > annobin-9.24.2-fc33
> > binutils-2.35-1.fc33
> > gcc-10.2.1-1.fc33
> > glibc-2.31.9000-21.fc33
> As Kevin mentioned in a followup, he's untagged the 2.35 build so this should 
> be
> working again.
>
> I think I see the root cause in the linker now.  It's probably an uncommon
> scenario, but I doubt binutils is the only affected package.
>
> The even better news is I think we can go ahead and green light the mass 
> rebuild
> for Monday.  Two reasons.  One, I expect the preconditions necessary to trip 
> the
> bug to be uncommon.  Two, I think we can reliably detect a broken binary by 
> the
> existence of absolute symbols in the dynamic symbol table.
>
> The latter in particular means we've got a method where we can find affected
> packages while Nick and I iterate on the linker fix.  So even if the bug leaks
> into packages, we can find them and do targeted rebuilds.

For reference I saw an issue yesterday with a build of rpm
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=47871132
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to