On Wed, 2020-07-29 at 10:11 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 10:25:24AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > > On Wed, 2020-07-29 at 09:19 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 10:31:32AM -0400, Scott Talbert wrote: > > > > On Wed, 29 Jul 2020, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > > > > > > libnbd failed in the mass rebuild. I kicked off a second build by > > > > > hand, and it failed in the exact same way: > > > > > > > > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=48118058 > > > > > > > > > > DEBUG util.py:623: Downloading Packages: > > > > > DEBUG util.py:621: Error: Error downloading packages: > > > > > DEBUG util.py:621: Cannot download > > > > > toplink/packages/ocaml/4.11.0/0.4.dev2.fc33/s390x/ocaml-compiler-libs-4.11.0-0.4.dev2.fc33.s390x.rpm: > > > > > All mirrors were tried > > > > > > > > > > Is this a generic s390 problem of is there really something wrong with > > > > > the ocaml-compiler-libs package? If it's generic then I guess this > > > > > sort of error could be affecting a lot of other packages in the mass > > > > > rebuild. > > > > > > > > Seems to be a generic s390x problem (with networking / connectivity?). > > > > At > > > > least one of my packages failed in a similar was on s390x. > > > > > > Yes, the local to the s390x builders cache had issues last night. > > > I disabled all builders and rebooted it, but likely it failed a lot of > > > builds. > > > > > > Additionally, it seems like from time to time it just gets swamped. > > > > > > We are planning on resubmitting the failed builds after the mass rebuild > > > is complete. Or you can feel free to resubmit any of yours that failed > > > in this way before then. > > > > > > I already have some ideas on how to make the s390x setup more robust, > > > but I'm not going to make changes in the middle of the mass rebuild, but > > > hopefully that will help for the next one. > > That reminds me. My local testing has shown that -flto=auto works > > reasonably > > well and can help significantly with build times (it parallelizes the > > compiler > > invocations that occur at link time). > > > > It'd planned to enable it after the mass rebuild, but I find myself > > wondering if > > I should go ahead and update redhat-rpm-config now so that the second pass > > over > > the packages will be faster. > > > > Thoughts? > > If all it does is parallelize, I'd say enable it anytime... Done. jeff > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org