On Tue, Aug 4, 2020, 01:50 Michel Alexandre Salim <mic...@michel-slm.name> wrote:
> Hi Fabio, > > On Mon, 2020-08-03 at 19:29 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 6:59 PM Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com> > > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On 8/3/20 5:53 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 05:21:58PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > > > <grumpy mode> > > > > > I just noticed that a lot my packages got a FTBFS because of > > > > > failing to build on s390x. The first set of rebuilds failed > > > > > with: > > > > > > > > > > "BuildrootError: Requested repo (1785390) is DELETED" > > > > > > > > > > The second set of rebuilds failed with: > > > > > > > > > > "rpm.error: error reading package header" > > > > > > > > > > errors. > > > > > > > > > > The last error was also seen quite a bit during the F32 mass > > > > > rebuid ... > > > > > > > > I'm sorry this is happening, and it makes me very grumpy too. > > > > > > > > I have some thoughts on improvements we can make to help try and > > > > make > > > > this better, but I was under the impression it was mostly working > > > > ok for > > > > the second pass. > > > > > > > > We went from 4162 to 2833 failures, so it had to have been > > > > working at > > > > least sometime there? > > > > > > It seems for me the s390x failures on the second build are limited > > > to package names starting with A-Z and "aa*" - "an*" . > > > > > > Any chance we can get a third mass rebuild for package-names > > > starting > > > with A-Z and "a*" ? > > > > > > Or maybe all those where the only failing platform is on s390x ? > > > > > > (no idea how easy it is to script any of this) > > > > I am already resubmitting all builds that failed in koji but that > > currently pass locally in mock with "--enablerepo local". > > So far this has reduced the number of FTBFS packages by almost 100, > > and the script is still running. > > This should take care of all packages that only failed due to infra > > issues. > > > (snip) > Could this be why the queue to get an s390x build seems longer than > usual today, and is there an ETA for when this script will finish? > > I have some builds for Eternal Terminal (et) that have all completed on > all platforms (even armv7hl) but are still all queued on s390x > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=27370 > > Thanks, > Almost certainly no. Since I'm running a local mock build as sanity check before submitting anything to koji, there's usually no more than 3-4 builds running at one point, and I'm submitting them with both --fail-fast (if they fail anywhere, other arches are cancelled immediately) and --background (lower priority). Fabio > -- > Michel Alexandre Salim > profile: https://keybase.io/michel_slm > chat via email: https://delta.chat/ > GPG key: 5DCE 2E7E 9C3B 1CFF D335 C1D7 8B22 9D2F 7CCC 04F2 > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
