On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 11:54 AM Chris Murphy <li...@colorremedies.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 11:09 AM Sergio Belkin <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > However swap usage is still high :
> > > free -m
> > > total used free shared buff/cache
> > > available
> > > Mem: 15887 8577 1187 4587 6123
> > > 2382
> > > Swap: 4095 3854 241
> > >
> > > It's weird, isn't it?
> >
> > >> It's consistent. Only ~240 MB of 900M for PK had been evicted to swap.
> > >> When restarting PK, it dropped those 240MB in swap. Free memory also
> > >> went up no doubt. I don't know why it's using so much memory, what all
> > >> these anonymous pages are. If you catch it going above 500M, check
> > >> /proc/pid/status and let's see what the breakdown is of memory usage.
> >
> > Ok but smem tell me that around 300M is swap used, and the ~3.5G
> > remaining???
> > Is there a way to find the culprit processes?
> > Thanks in advance!
>
> I'm not familiar enough with smem to know what it does or why it's
> missing things, but
>
> for file in /proc/*/status ; do awk '/VmSwap|Name/{printf $2 "
> "$3}END{ print ""}' $file; done | sort -k 2 -n -r | less
>
> Finds more things using swap than smem. As in, smem isn't showing
> packagekitd for me at all, and yet /proc/pid/status for pk is showing
> VmSwap is 16M, which at the moment is 20% of swap.
>
> What do you get for zramctl?
Ok for some reason 'sudo' gets me different results with smem. Try this:
sudo smem -t --sort swap
--
Chris Murphy
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
