Hi Adam,

Adam Jackson <a...@redhat.com> writes:

> I've gone through (almost) every package I could find that depended on
> one of the xorg-x11-* superpackages and fixed them up as best I could.
> Here's how that went.
>
> lxde-common has been switched to explicitly require xprop from
> xorg-x11-utils, but still explicitly requires xorg-x11-server-utils
> despite that AFAICT it never mentions any of the utilities therein. I
> assume this is a packaging convenience, the package owner would need
> to decide which pieces of -server-utils are really wanted.
>
> i3 has a Recommends for xorg-x11-apps but the package itself does not
> ever mention any of the apps contained therein. I'm leaving it alone,
> the package owner can decide the intent there.

I have inherited the spec file from the previous maintainer and the
recommends of xorg-x11-apps was added over 4 years ago for reasons that
are not apparent to me from the commit log. I see no compelling reason
for keeping the it as none of the applications appear necessary or for i3.


Cheers,

Dan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to