On Fri, 2020-08-28 at 18:51 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 25. 08. 20 v 16:25 Petr Menšík napsal(a): > > No, unfortunately the key is there, but the package is incomplete. > > > > If you have enabled gpg signatures verification, it would fail. At least > > it does to me. > > > > Check it with: > > > > rpm -ql fedora-gpg-keys | grep fedora-34-$(arch) > > > > It just does not provide correct key. > > > Actually, yesterday I did update of another system with my approach and > you are right that the fedora-gpg-keys-33-0.9 did not contained the > proper links to the key. However, the fedora-gpg-keys-33-0.10 works just > fine (not really sure what caused the difference).
The change to archmap in this commit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-repos/c/5f02f474842d23a0217c1118893f508009236c18?branch=f33 which landed between 0.9 and 0.10 (the versioning was fixed up in the next commit). -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
