On 30. 08. 20 4:07, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Quick question: for Python there's both python-devel and python-sig --
this seems overkill for Lua, right? Would starting lua@lists be enough?

Not only it is overkill, but it brings problems.
For the story, see this ticket:

https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/5478

tl;dr the python-devel list is open to anybody
      the python-sig is a private (bugzilla mostly) list for the packaging group
      people are confused why cannot they see the python-sig list
      even when they are members of the Python SIG

For a new SIG I'd do the following:

Establish a FAS group for "Lua provenpackagers". Make sure the name it not to be confused with the Lua SIG, but note that the FAS group usually needs to be called ...-sig. I'd go with lua-packagres-sig or lua-maintainers-sig. Get it a mailing list needed for Bugzilla, e.g. lua-packagres-sig@lists. Don't mention it anywhere :)

Establish a general mailing list about Lua. Most likely lua@lists. Mention it everywhere.

(Also, I couldn't find documentation on starting a new mailing list.
Presumably an Infra pagure ticket?)

Yes.

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to