On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 12:55 AM Michel Alexandre Salim < mic...@michel-slm.name> wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-08-27 at 11:13 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/OptimizeSquashFS > > > > == Summary == > > Improve compression ratio of SquashFS filesystem on the installation > > media. > > > ... > > > > Based on the results above, I'd suggest selecting the following > > ''optimal configuration'': XZ algorithm, with block size of 1MiB and > > without BCJ filter (plain xz -b 1M, without -Xbcj x86). > > On the right, you can see the impact of the compression algorithms on > > installation time. > > > Why XZ as opposed to, say, ZSTD? > Bohdan's preference seems to be to make the images smaller. I'm in the opposite camp. I'd like to keep the images roughly the same size (or smaller, but just a bit smaller, not as small as possible) and hugely speed up the installation instead. Which means zstd in one of the configurations. Each image is downloaded just once, but installed 1+ times. And with automation and all the CI work which Fedora and Red Hat invests a lot of effort into, it can be a hundred installations from a single image (without being bound to slow USB stick transfer speeds, as in the proposal). Of course, I'm biased. Bohdan, could you build the same image in several configurations (the most likely candidates) and share them with us? (We can host them in our QA fedorapeople space, if needed). That would allow interested parties to test and benchmark the experience themselves.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
