On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 17:01:02 +0200, Tomas Mraz <tm...@redhat.com> wrote: > I say that the example of Webkit should be removed because if it is not > possible to backport the security patch and due to the version update > Midori has to be updated to a new version regardless of the changes of > user experience. The part of the example "judgement call based on how > intrusive the changes are" does not make any sense. We just cannot keep > the old insecure version regardless on how intrusive the changes are.
Security isn't binary. It may be that a security update addresses an issue that can not happen in normal cases. It might be reasonable to just document the cases where there is a problem so as to warn people not to do that. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
