Ben, Can Fedora first-party flatpaks be built from unsigned, untrusted content outside of the Fedora Repos? Or can they only be built from content otherwise already present in Fedora? Just curious what benefits a first-party flatpak has versus an upstream one.
AFAIK, the last Fedora Container docs said that all Container content must be pulled from Fedora Repos, and therefore was left holding a bunch of RPMs anyways. - A On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 11:38 AM Ben Cotton <bcot...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 10:54 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > <devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > > On 10.09.2020 16:10, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > > > Flatpak is way better suited for our use case and in addition gives us > > > access to a way bigger install base. > > > > Flathub is a third-party repository and not related to Fedora at all. > > > Flat*hub* is third party, but we have first-party flatpaks at > registry.fedoraproject.org. The flatpak package adds it as a remote > via /usr/lib/systemd/system/flatpak-add-fedora-repos.service > > -- > Ben Cotton > He / Him / His > Senior Program Manager, Fedora & CentOS Stream > Red Hat > TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
