On Mon, Sep 14, 2020, 10:35 Vít Ondruch <vondr...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Dne 14. 09. 20 v 10:11 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 09:50:45AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> Reading this proposal and with the EPEL8 experience, where there was not > >> even wiki page, where I could state that I don't care about EPEL and I > >> had to reply into every BZ independently, wouldn't it make sense to move > >> EPEL into its own dist-git namespace? > >> > >> I guess that in the CVS days, having EPEL branch was fine. During PkgDB > >> days, where we could assign maintainer to each branch, it was still > >> fine. But since we lost this ability, isn't it time to rethink the > >> setup? > > We have the ability back, see the answers from Neal Gompa. > > > Well, yes, right. But apparently, it is not fully working. E.g. looking > at Ruby [1], it says I am EPEL maintainer while there is certainly not > EPEL branch. Also, there might be EPEL maintainer (actually Pagure lists > just BZ assignee), but I am not sure if they are listed between > "members" or not. I cannot set my preferred default. So there is still > lot to desire. > > From this POV, the separate namespace could have more advantages. > That's a shortcoming of the current implementation, but you can always set the EPEL BugZilla override to "orphan" if you want to make it official that you have no interest in creating an EPEL branch. Fabio > > > > >> I think this would give more power to EPEL SIG and give relieve > >> to Fedora packagers. > > What you are saying would make sense if there was only the EPEL SIG. > > But we also have plenty of packagers who do care about their EPEL > packages, > > > Do we know the ratio? I am not saying that we don't but I don't see > "plenty" to be anything we should base any decision. > > > > and they would be inconvenienced by such a split. It seems that there > > are even people who like to keep one spec file for all branches, incl. > > EPEL. > > > People still might have locally one repository with two remotes, so I > probably missing what is the point here. Having to pull EPEL branch or > not is also difference, but I don't see we should adding this into > equation. > > > Vít > > > > [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
