On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 12:31:59PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > Finally I am interested in your proposal to implement a different way > to reduce the size of DIE trees by eliminating "unused" DIEs. It is > hard to predict what effect that would have without seeing an > implementation (in theory GCC with LTO would not actually generate > debuginfo for unused functions). But I think that can be done separate > from your proposal and combined with other size reduction techniques.
And note that GCC already does implement -feliminate-unused-debug-{symbols,types} which are enabled by default and are (at least in my eyes) sometimes too aggressive, so by eliminating even further DIEs the debug experience might be even worse. Jakub _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org