* Michael Catanzaro: > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 5:18 pm, Florian Weimer <fwei...@redhat.com> > wrote: >> But the DNS view provided by the Red Hat VPN is what disables the >> centralized DNS resolvers in browsers in these configurations. The >> magic browser probe no longer fails with the change in DNS routing >> (which the proposal confusingly names “Split DNS”) because it goes >> out over the public Internet, where it is not filtered, unlike the >> Red Hat VPN. > > Hm, I'm pretty sure this is a Firefox-specific issue, right? Fedora's > Firefox is patched to use system DNS, so it shouldn't matter for us. > I'm not aware of any other browser that ignores system DNS; at least, > I'm fairly certain Chrome and Epiphany will both never do this.
It seems that you are right about Chromium: | We have no plans to support this approach. We believe that our | deployment model is significantly different from Mozilla's, and as a | result canary domains won't be needed. <https://www.chromium.org/developers/dns-over-https> However, you wrote earlier that “split DNS” is not available over nss_dns, so I think Chromium is still impacted because it uses the same interfaces that nss_dns would use in this mode (i.e., not nss_resolve). Thanks, Florian -- Red Hat GmbH, https://de.redhat.com/ , Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243, Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Brian Klemm, Laurie Krebs, Michael O'Neill _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
